Page 102 - Acharya Vinoba Bhave in 21st Century ISBN
P. 102

21oha “krkCnh esa vkpk;Z fouksck Hkkos dh izklafxdrk






               And so it continued throughout the first part of 1952. Vinoba would pointedly refuse money gifts and
               encourage institutions to rely on their own resources rather than donations of money. This came to end

               only in October 1952 with sampattidân—Vinoba’s ingenious solution to accepting money without
               actually having to touch it or be responsible for it.



               III. Consequences and legacy

                       The Paunar experiment in self-reliance with kânchan-mukti and rishi-kheti did not fail; it was
               abandoned in favor of bhoodan and what seemed a more promising way of guiding the world to

               greater equality and non-violence. We have no way of knowing how the experiment might have
               developed had Vinoba stayed with it. What we can do, however, is look how the three-year experiment

               affected the world around it and left traces in the years and decades that follow.
                       Eventually, the bhoodan-gramdan movement completely eclipsed kânchan-mukti, first with

               the development of sampattidân and later with the huge influx of money from governments and the
               Gandhi Smarak Nidhi to hire workers and carry on the movement.

                       Still, if one looks, Vinoba never lost his aversion to money, the impulse behind kânchan-mukti.
               One can see it later in many places in the Sarvodaya movement. One example is the Palni decision of

               November 1956 (following another illness of Vinoba) when the Sarvodaya movement disbanded its
               existing bhoodan organizations and renounced Gandhi Smarak Nidhi aid in order to purify and revitalize

               itself. Another example is the sarvodaya pâtra, a household pot in which to collect handfuls of grain
               (i.e., real produce, not money) as contributions to support Sarvodaya work. The whole gramdan

               framework, although it did involve a grâm-kosh (village fund), was intended to minimize the need for
               money and for interaction with the world beyond the village.

                       As late as April 1963, Vinoba still held out the vision of a kânchan-mukt society—it will be the
               result, he says, of people increasing their appreciation of work and love. Once work ensures there is

               enough, love will see to it that it is shared. Society can be like a joint family. People will then not pay
               attention to money and there will be a kânchan-mukt society.



               The transformation of rishi kheti

                       Unlike Kânchan-mukti, the term rishi-kheti still has some popular currency. But it has been
               transformed well beyond the original idea of farming by hand. Today it has become an alternative for

               “natural farming” and seems more likely to be identified with Masanobu Fukuoka than Vinoba.
                       Fukuoka is famous for the no-till and organic techniques he developed over decades of

                                                                                                        18
               agricultural experience and experimentation in Japan. In a recent technical article on Indian agriculture ,









                                                           102
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107