Page 105 - Acharya Vinoba Bhave in 21st Century ISBN
P. 105

21oha “krkCnh esa vkpk;Z fouksck Hkkos dh izklafxdrk






               of money, perhaps he could have been more pragmatic, more like Gandhi, and looked for ways to limit
               abuse rather than trying to eliminate money altogether. For whatever reason, however, Vinoba could

               not come to this understanding. Perhaps it clashed with deeper philosophical principles or dashed a
               dream where everyone works and shars just like an ideal joint family.

                       There is, I think, absolutely no scope for reviving interest in Vinoba today through kânchan-
               mukti. There are currents of thought today—like the survivalists who prepare for a world in chaos

               where money will be useless, or the young people who dedicate themselves to collecting experiences
               rather than money—which might seem to carry hints of the kânchan-mukti ethos. But I don’t think they

               do.



               Rishi-Kheti
                       With rishi-kheti, the situation is different. The term is still in use today as “natural farming,” a

               meaning rather tenuously connected to the original one. Consider:
                       Rishi-kheti (as “manual farming”) Rishi-kheti (as “natural farming”)

                       hard work     minimize labor inputs
                       dig by hand, dig, dig, digno-till

                       bread-labor, swadeshi respect nature



                       This is not to say one cannot find compatibilities. Bhaskar Save did and used this to strengthen
               his faith in the knowledge he was accumulating from his own experience. Like Gandhi, Vinoba was a

               sensitive observer of the world and said many, many things, some of which have relevant environmental
               connotations or implications. With environmentalism being so popular today, it is only natural that

               people make efforts to show how Gandhi was an environmentalist (which he obviously was in some
               senses). You could do the same with Vinoba. And if people want to do this, they will, and I see no harm

               in it. It may even have benefits.



               Reference :
               1.      Vinoba Sahitya, 14:206-7 (Vinoba at Paunar, Nov. 8, 1950)

               2.      This is only a brief summary of Vinoba’s view. See Dada Dharmadhikari (ed.), Sevagram
                      rachanatmak karyakartasammelan ka vivran (Gandhi Seva Sangh, 1949), pp. 4-7 of the

                      main section, for the full and very sharp exchange between Kakasaheb Kalelkar and Vinoaba
                      Bhave on March 11, 1948.

               3.      Harijan, XII:19 (July 11, 1948), 168. Translation from Marathi of part of a letter from Vinoba
                      to workers about Khadi direction and experimentation.








                                                           105
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110